Strengthening Oral Advocacy Skills for ALPA Moot Court Contenders

Jul.28, 2026

The ALPA Jessup teams recently participated in an insightful training session on oral advocacy, legal argument, and presentation skills, organized by the Moot Court Management team at ALPA College and led by Parwiz Esmati. Mr. Esmati currently practices in construction litigation and claims support at Kraftson Caudle. He also brings extensive Jessup experience, having won a national round and received the Best Oralist award in two Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court competitions.

The session was designed to help participants strengthen the practical skills required for the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition and other forms of legal advocacy. A central focus of the training was how to structure a persuasive oral argument. Participants learned how to present their main claims clearly, organize legal submissions effectively, and guide judges through complex legal issues. The session also examined how legal authorities should be used during oral pleadings, not simply by citing cases or treaties, but by explaining how those authorities directly support the argument being presented.

Considerable attention was given to answering judges’ questions. Participants discussed how to listen carefully, respond directly, and remain composed when faced with difficult or unexpected questions. They also explored practical strategies for responding under pressure without losing the structure of their argument. The training emphasized that strong advocacy is not only about speaking confidently, but also about demonstrating flexibility, judgment, and a clear understanding of the legal issues.

The session also addressed the importance of distinguishing between helpful and harmful facts. Participants learned how to emphasize facts that support their position while responding honestly and strategically to facts that may appear unfavorable. Rather than avoiding weaknesses, they were encouraged to make reasonable concessions when necessary. Such concessions can strengthen an advocate’s credibility and show judges that the argument is balanced, realistic, and grounded in the record.

Because many Jessup activities are conducted online, the training also included practical guidance on virtual advocacy and presentation. Participants discussed voice, pace, eye contact, body language, camera positioning, and the importance of maintaining professional communication in an online setting. These skills are especially important when advocates must establish credibility and keep judges engaged through a screen.

The session was interactive and practice oriented. Participants had opportunities to reflect on common advocacy challenges, test different approaches, and receive practical guidance on improving their courtroom communication. The exercises helped them understand how preparation, organization, and repeated practice can turn a legally sound argument into a persuasive oral submission.

Through trainings such as this, ALPA seeks to create opportunities for Afghan law students and young legal professionals to develop the skills needed to participate confidently in future Jessup competitions. The session strengthened not only the participants’ ability to argue a case, but also their capacity to think critically, communicate clearly, and respond professionally under pressure.